Liberal Pundit: Democrats Not to Blame For Poverty in Cities They’ve Run For Years

Once again Democrats believe they have no blame for anything going on in the country.

When it comes to the way the country is run you can pretty much assume that whatever party has control of your environment has a direct outcome on the politics in your area. So yes that means that the politicians running your district are directly responsible for economic downfall experienced.

Via American Outlet:

NewsBusters reported:

Lamont Hill: Just Because Poor Cities Are Run by Democrats, Doesn’t Mean Democrats Are to Blame

After Cuomo brought up a new ABC News/WSJ poll that predicted only one percent of blacks would vote for Trump, he asked Bongino why Trump was unable to make the case to blacks that their Democrat-run communities would only keep them in poverty. Bongino responded:

DAN BONGINO: Yeah, you know, Chris, this is one of the great mysteries of my life. If I was granted omnipotence by the Lord tomorrow to change one thing, it would be to be able to walk into the black community and largely in inner cities and say, please, look at what’s happening here. I mean, these communities have been ruled monopolistic by far left big government liberals for decades. In some cases since the ’20s and ’30s. These communities have been driven into the ground. I mean, you don’t have to be a scientist to look at the evidence, the correlational evidence right in front of you. Liberalism correlates with poverty and high crime every single place it’s been tried. Yet, you have some members of the black community which support the democratic party, which continues to bankrupt them.

Marc Lamont Hill took offense to that, wincing then claiming there was “[N]othing far left about Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia,” at which Bongino, flabbergasted, asked, “What?”

Lamont Hill explained further, but his answer didn’t really clarify who was responsible for these cities being in poverty…

Watch Here:

 

5 Comments

  1. Birgitta May 2, 2017
  2. Eddie May 2, 2017
  3. Frank May 2, 2017
  4. John May 2, 2017
  5. Johnny May 2, 2017

Leave a Reply